Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6112 14
Original file (NR6112 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
yal

+
(

 

 
 

2490

 
 

PUG

moiVil,

A

 

IAL

A

 
 

 

ea nn

C
O
Zz

iO

SE

i

NT OF THE NAVY

es

URTHOU
5

=

IRR
Ve

 

FOR COF
an

=
fe
oc

Mac

 

2

umme

4

Ss

 

e

 

1g
1

h

 

—
3 4
4

f

o

et de getia
wi

a

e

Aust
ULLe

Anata
LC
curr

Ol

 

rn

TYrOY
Lil

 
  

ay

 
 

 

163]
-
GS
Ba

vW

C

 

ansferabili

ae
LL
Docket No.

NR6112-14

benefit. Members who are retired are nov eligible te transfer

your education benefits.

Evidence shows that you failed to take the steps necessary tc
transfer benefits. Your application claims, “I was not aware of
the requirement to transfer the entitlement while I was on still

---* = erie AS eoranancry atrear

on active duty....i becaue SWweee SE LALe aioarepan

seeing an AFN commercial while overseas discussing GI Bill
benefits which led me to pelieve that I had lost this benefit.”
Your application further claims “I started terminal leave in
July 2009 before the Post 9/11 GI Bill became effective and
officially retired on September 30, 2009." However, the Board
found that whether as you claim you were never informed about
the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to your retirement, information
about the Post-9/11 GI Bill has been readily and publicly
available, and although you were on terminal leave, you were not

barred from using those available resources to educate

yourself

on your educational benefits. Under these circumstances, the

Board found that no relief is warranted. Accordingly,
application has been denied. The names and votes of
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

your

che members

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such

that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upo
‘chin one vear from che dat

   
 
   

is evidence not previous-)\
prior to maling ‘+e Gecision in this ca in THis

Ss imporzant =o
actaches to al
for a correction a

the applicant to demonstrate the existence

error or injustice.

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Enclosure: HOMC memo 7220 MPO of 31 Oct 14

You are entizled to have
n submission of néw

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6468 14

    Original file (NR6468 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    { ) al r a) ¢ a Tm 6d \ > gus oO 4 t cd ie) ) i ) r AUT) oti C { QO -d C ay) ty 43 GS o S es b Docket No. Members who are retired are not eligible to cransfer your education benefits. The Board found that there was not revision to the Post-9/11 GI Bill law or policy in December 2009 as you claim.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14

    Original file (NR5899 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6441 14

    Original file (NR6441 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your application claims, “I was eligible to transfer to the Flee. Reserve Pemruary oe 2011. iL was stationed at the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) at the time the Post 9/11 GI (Bjiii was enacted and consulted several individuals prior to electing to transfer to the Fleet Reserve.” Petitioner further claims that “one of those individuals was a person responsible for the approval to transfer eligibility for all Navy members at NPC. This letter states that I had an active duty date obligation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR773 14

    Original file (NR773 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Members who are retired are not ¢€ the benefits. Because my retirement date followed 50 closely behind the 1 memo (2270un2002) , the memo was release of the Post 9/11 GI Bil not well known at my command and key points of the memo were not ement.” However, the Board disseminated to me before my retir formation about the Post-9/11 found that whether as you claim in GI Bill was not disseminated to you or the command before your retirement, information about the Post-9/1i GI Billi has...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5036 14

    Original file (NR5036 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your application Ciditin, “Se ReGaets soo, T siqned a 1070/613 (Page 13) and also updated the system to transfer my POST 9-11 GI Bill entitlements to my dependents. pr-9> ac transferability request: anda 2, Complete e-ectron-c <= election using TEE.” The Board members furzher founc onlv change which occurred to the program, occurred w portal during affect the databases that contained the have not submitted any proof contrary to the Board members took into consideration, that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5095 14

    Original file (NR5095 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Members who are retired are not eligible to transfer the benefits. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3219 14

    Original file (NR3219 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 7220 MPO of 18 Jul 14, 4 copy of which is attached. Members who are retired ar the benefits. Your application claims, that “I was erroneously denied the ability to convey pest 211 educational penefits Lu my children.” You sise claim that “At sometime between April and June 2010, I made the attempt to transfer my educational benefits to my two oldest children...I was told by the Staff Non-Commissioned Officer in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4914 14

    Original file (NR4914 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In August 2011, NAVADMIN 235/11 changed this requirement and established a deadline for transfer of eligibility of August 1, 2013. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Beginning 1 August 2013, DoD Policy requires that all service members who wish to transfer their education benefits to a family member obligate for an additional four years of service regardless of their time in service or retirement date.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5637 14

    Original file (NR5637 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2389 14

    Original file (NR2389 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Members who are retired are not eligible to transfer. You also stated in your application that you “submitted a retirement request of 1 August 2014."